Date: 2008-01-29 02:44 am (UTC)
The dumb freelancers may take on as much as they can and more, but we intelligent freelancers are enough in demand that we can, to a certain extent, pick and choose. I've been freelancing for over 20 years and have never lacked for work.

Random House had, I think, already started to phase out its in-house copy editors before it was acquired by Bertelsmann, though at least a few were there until pretty recently. I think they may still have one or two on staff. But these people mostly work on large, complicated and/or high-profile books.

In fact, as I'm sure you're aware, virtually all trade books are copy edited by freelancers. You, as author, get pot luck, though if you know someone good you can recommend that he or she work on your book, and you might get what you ask for.

The situation now is actually much better than during the Depression, when the in-house editor often did the copy editing and proofreading. In my experience, many editors are excellent copy editors and proofreaders, and many are not. So you're probably better off with an experienced freelancer.

But any proofreader should have caught "knock" for "nock" (even if LJ's spell checker doesn't recognize the latter) and "puss" (!) for "pus." Now if you'll excuse me, the writer has just referred to the Ventures as "the premiere guitar-based combo"...

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

April 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314 1516 171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 04:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios