The first equation doesn't mean much to me. The second I might be able to solve with a calculator, but I'm not gonna sit here and multiply out those numbers....
True, but some calculators do scientific notation. You could at least verify that it was approximately correct or not. You could also possibly factor out some numbers to reduce it.
The first one looks sort of like quantum gravity and the third one like cosmology. No idea what M(H0) means -- the other side of that equation is pi times (roughly the square of the electron charge in Planck units) to the eighth power times the Planck mass. So, um, beats me...
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 09:51 pm (UTC)The first equation doesn't mean much to me. The second I might be able to solve with a calculator, but I'm not gonna sit here and multiply out those numbers....
no subject
Date: 2005-11-09 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-10 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-10 04:53 am (UTC)I love the waning donut on the blackboard
Date: 2005-11-09 10:44 pm (UTC)Mmmmmm, waning donut...
Date: 2005-11-09 10:48 pm (UTC)Love that user icon, btw. Very Pythonesque.
to hell with traditional modes of communication
Date: 2005-11-09 10:57 pm (UTC)Your answer to that question will effect, in real time, my official email tomorrow morning.
Can it be you have never had the pleasure of Achewood?!??!?
http://www.achewood.com
Prepare for split sides!
Convenient as convenient can be
Date: 2005-11-09 11:04 pm (UTC)Even now I am employing needle and thread to stitch my sides back together!